インフォショップ ホームへ 株式会社グローバルインフォメーション
サイトマップ
その他のカテゴリ

商品カタログ

医療/バイオの調査資料販 MEDINFO.JP

バイオシミラー特集
バイオシミラー特集ページ バイオシミラーに関連したレポートを紹介致します。

Translational Cancer Medicine 公式サイト

Outsourcing Asia Summit 2009 公式サイト

Global Healthcare Congress 2009 公式サイト

BioMedical Asia 2009 公式サイト

China 2009 Pharmaceutical R&D Summit 公式サイト

Drug Discovery & Development of Innovative Therapeutics Japan 2009 公式サイト

Protein Kinase Targets 2009 公式サイト

Structure-Based Drug Design 2009 公式サイト

World Vaccine Congress Asia 2009 公式サイト

World Pharmaceutical Congress 2009 公式サイト

Drug Discovery & Development of Innovative Therapeutics 2009 公式サイト
English Korean Chinese
【 英文市場調査報告書 】

骨髄異形成症候群(MDS)

Stakeholder Opinions: Myelodysplastic Syndromes - First approvals spur some interest in a niche market

商品コード : 59584 Datamonitor
出版日 : 2007/12
発行 : Datamonitor
電話でのお問い合わせ
価格情報
概要 原文目次
※この商品は英文にてご提供いたします。

Abstract

Overview

Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell disorders. With a forecast incidence of 36,769 across the seven major markets in 2007, they are one of the most common hematological malignancies. Currently, the only potentially curative option is hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but this is only suitable for a small subset of patients.

Scope

  • MDS epidemiology, disease diagnosis and overview of current treatment options
  • Remaining unmet needs in the treatment of MDS
  • Research and analysis of the MDS pipeline with in-depth clinical assessment of Phase III candidates
  • Stakeholder opinions based on qualitative interviews with key opinion leaders from the US and EU

Report Highlights

Patients' old age and associated co-morbidities often prohibit the use of high-intensity therapies such as hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, most patients rely on supportive care and low-intensity therapies for the management of the disease.

While low-intensity therapies such as Vidaza, Dacogen and Revlimid have improved patient outcomes, higher-risk MDS remains a disease with poor prognosis. Therefore, there is a great need for more effective drugs with favorable toxicity profiles to improve patient survival and quality of life.

Recent approvals have spurred interest in MDS but this has yet to be translated into considerable R&D efforts in the field. There is only one drug in Phase III development, Schering-Plough' s Sarasar (lonafarnib). This molecular targeted therapy is unlikely to offer any significant improvements over existing therapies.

Reasons to Purchase

  • Gain an insight into the current classification systems and the epidemiology trends for MDS
  • Identify the limitations of current MDS treatment options and consider the remaining unmet needs
  • Acquire a detailed appreciation and impartial perspective of the MDS pipeline

Table of Contents

  • ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE
    • About the Oncology pharmaceutical analysis team
  • CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    • Scope of analysis
    • Datamonitor insight into the MDS market
    • Related reports
    • Upcoming reports
  • CHAPTER 2 OVERVIEW OF MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
    • Introduction
      • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of hematological malignancies
      • Risk factors in the development of MDS
      • Hallmark of MDS - A hypercellular bone marrow with dysplastic changes in combination with peripheral cytopenias
        • Hypercellularity
        • Dysplasia
        • Peripheral cytopenias
      • Mortality often results from the complications of peripheral blood cytopenias
      • MDS is often a diagnosis of exclusion
      • The molecular pathogenesis of MDS
        • Chromosomal abnormalities are common but little is known about the molecular basis of the disease
        • MDS arises as a multistep process
        • Accelerated apoptosis underlies the cytopenias in early MDS
        • Excessive proliferation accompanies disease progression
    • The classification of MDS
      • French American British (FAB) System
        • The FAB classification system is based on morphological criteria
        • Limitations of the FAB system
      • World Health Organization (WHO) System
        • The WHO classification system incorporates new diagnostic information
        • Classification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML)
        • Limitations of the WHO classification system
      • International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS)
        • The IPSS classification system is the current standard for evaluating prognosis in MDS patients
        • Limitations of the IPSS system
    • Epidemiology
      • The epidemiology of MDS is poorly monitored
      • MDS is predominantly a disease of the elderly
      • A recent study shows that the majority of patients fall into the IPSS Low and Intermediate-1 risk groups
      • The incidence of MDS is expected to rise
      • There will be more than 57,000 new cases of MDS across the seven major markets in 2016
  • CHAPTER 3 CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR MDS
    • Overview of MDS management
      • The aim of treatment differs in lower- and higher-risk patients
      • The choice of therapy is not solely dependent on a patient' s IPSS risk group
    • Summary of current trends in MDS management
    • The management of IPSS lower-risk MDS patients
      • Supportive care approaches
        • Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and iron chelation therapy
        • Erythropoietin (EPO)
        • Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)
        • Platelet transfusions
      • Non-chemotherapy low-intensity agents
        • Thalomid (thalidomide; Celgene/Pharmion)
        • Revlimid (lenalidomide; Celgene)
        • Antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin A
        • Anti-TNF therapy
        • Vitamin D analogs
      • Low-intensity chemotherapy
        • Vidaza and Dacogen
    • The management of IPSS higher-risk patients
      • Low-intensity chemotherapy - the hypomethylating agents
        • Vidaza (azacitidine; Pharmion)
        • Dacogen (decitabine; MGI Pharma)
        • Comparisons between Vidaza and Dacogen
      • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
        • HSCT is the only potentially curative option for MDS patients but its use in older patients is problematic
        • The morbidity and mortality risks associated with HSCT often prohibits its use in lower-risk patients
        • Different transplantation options exist for the treatment of MDS
      • High-intensity chemotherapy
        • High-intensity chemotherapy is an alternative option for higher-risk patients
        • The use of high-intensity chemotherapy may be difficult to justify
    • The management of CMML
      • Supportive care and low-intensity therapy
      • High-intensity therapy
  • CHAPTER 4 UNMET NEEDS IN MDS
    • Summary of unmet needs
      • A better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis
      • Increased R&D efforts
      • Low-intensity therapies with improved efficacy and better toxicity profiles
      • Low-intensity therapies to improve symptoms of anemia and quality of life
      • More effective management of thrombocytopenia
      • Improved HSCT procedures
  • CHAPTER 5 PIPELINE ANALYSIS
    • Summary
    • Pipeline overview
      • Late-phase product pipeline for MDS
      • Phase II product pipeline for MDS
      • Phase I product pipeline for MDS
    • Late-phase MDS drug profiles
      • Sarasar (Lonafarnib; Schering-Plough)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
        • Datamonitor comments
    • Phase II MDS drug profiles
      • MGCD0103 (Pharmion/MethylGene)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Romiplostim (Amgen)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Ceflatonin (Myelostat; ChemGenex Pharmaceuticals)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Zarnestra (Tipifarnib; Johnson & Johnson)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Cloretazine (VNP40101M; Vion Pharmaceuticals)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Clolar/Evoltra (Clofarabine; Genzyme)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
      • Telintra (TLK-199; Telik)
        • Drug overview
        • Key historical events
        • Clinical trial data
  • APPENDIX
    • Bibliography
      • Journals
      • Websites
      • Other
    • Key opinion leaders
    • List of tables
    • List of figures
    • Abbreviations
    • About Datamonitor
      • About Datamonitor Healthcare
      • About the Oncology analysis team
    • Disclaimer
    • List of Tables
      • Table 1: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)
      • Table 2: Common recurring chromosomal abnormalities in MDS
      • Table 3: French American British (FAB) classification of MDS
      • Table 4: World Health Organization (WHO) classification of MDS
      • Table 5: WHO classification of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative diseases (MDS/MPD)
      • Table 6: Survival and progression to AML for MDS patients within the IPSS risk groups
      • Table 7: IPSS classification of MDS patients
      • Table 8: MDS incidence in the seven major markets, 2002-2016
      • Table 9: Treatment guidelines for MDS
      • Table 10: Iron chelators available in the US and EU markets, 2007
      • Table 11: Branded erythropoietins available in the US and EU markets, 2007
      • Table 12: Erythropoietins: ongoing clinical trials in MDS, 2007
      • Table 13: Branded colony-stimulating factors available in the US and EU, 2007
      • Table 14: Thalomid: key historical events
      • Table 15: Thalomid as a single agent in MDS: clinical trial results
      • Table 16: Revlimid: key historical events
      • Table 17: Revlimid: ongoing clinical trials in MDS, 2007
      • Table 18: Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) available in the US and EU, 2007
      • Table 19: Antithymocyte globulin: ongoing clinical trials in MDS, 2007
      • Table 20: Vidaza: Key historical events
      • Table 21: Vidaza: ongoing clinical trials in MDS, 2007
      • Table 22: Response criteria used in the Phase III study of Vidaza versus supportive care in MDS patients
      • Table 23: Dacogen: key historical events
      • Table 24: Dacogen: ongoing clinical trials in MDS, 2007
      • Table 25: Response criteria used in the Phase III study of Dacogen versus supportive care in MDS patients
      • Table 26: Types of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT)
      • Table 27: Comparative results of RIC HSCT studies
      • Table 28: High-intensity chemotherapy regimens in MDS: clinical trial results
      • Table 29: Pipeline drugs in Phase III development for MDS, 2007
      • Table 30: Pipeline drugs in Phase II development for MDS, 2007
      • Table 31: Pipeline drugs in Phase I development for MDS, 2007
      • Table 32: Sarasar: key historical events
      • Table 33: Ongoing clinical trials involving Sarasar in MDS, 2007
      • Table 34: MGCD0103: key historical events
      • Table 35: Ongoing clinical trials for MGCD0103 in MDS, 2007
      • Table 36: Romiplostim: key historical events
      • Table 37: Ongoing clinical trials for Romiplostim in MDS, 2007
      • Table 38: Ceflatonin: Key historical events
      • Table 39: Zarnestra: Key historical events
      • Table 40: Ongoing clinical trials involving Zarnestra in MDS, 2007
      • Table 41: Final results from a Phase II study of Zarnestra in Intermediate- and High-risk MDS
      • Table 42: Cloretazine: Key historical events
      • Table 43: Ongoing clinical trials involving Cloretazine in MDS, 2007
      • Table 44: Clolar: Key historical events
      • Table 45: Ongoing clinical trials involving Clolar in MDS, 2007
      • Table 46: Telintra: key historical events
      • Table 47: Ongoing clinical trials involving Telintra in MDS, 2007
      • Table 48: Abbreviations used in Stakeholder Opinions: Myelodysplastic Syndromes
    • List of Figures
      • Figure 1: Risk factors implicated in the onset of MDS
      • Figure 2: The hematopoiesis process
      • Figure 3: Hypercellularity and peripheral blood cytopenias in MDS
      • Figure 4: The pathophysiology of MDS
      • Figure 5: Median survival for each WHO MDS subtype
      • Figure 6: Cumulative risk of progressing to AML after 2 years for each MDS WHO subtype
      • Figure 7: International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) for MDS
      • Figure 8: Male and female incidence of MDS in the US over and under 65 years of age as a percentage of the total US patient population, 2007
      • Figure 9: MDS incidence in the seven major markets, 2007 and 2016
      • Figure 10: Incidence of MDS subtypes in the seven major markets, 2007
      • Figure 11: Factors complicating the management of MDS
      • Figure 12: Summary of supportive care, low-intensity and high-intensity therapies available for the management of MDS
      • Figure 13: Summary of current trends in the management of lower-risk MDS
      • Figure 14: Summary of current trends in the management of higher-risk MDS
      • Figure 15: NCCN treatment guidelines for lower-risk MDS patients (IPSS Low/Intermediate-1)
      • Figure 16: The implications of long-term transfusion dependence
      • Figure 17: Thrombocytopenia in MDS
      • Figure 18: Phase II study of Revlimid in MDS patients with del(5q)
      • Figure 19: Phase II study of Revlimid in MDS patients without del(5q)
      • Figure 20: Phase II study of Revlimid in Intermediate-2/High-risk MDS with del(5q): Interim results
      • Figure 21: Phase III study of Lymphoglobuline with cyclosporine versus best supportive care in Low/Intermediate-1 MDS
      • Figure 22: NCCN treatment guidelines for IPSS Intermediate-2/High-risk MDS patients
      • Figure 23: Phase III study of Vidaza versus supportive care in MDS patients
      • Figure 24: Phase III study of Vidaza versus conventional care regimens in higher-risk MDS
      • Figure 25: Phase III study of Dacogen versus supportive care in patients with MDS
      • Figure 26: US sales of Vidaza and Dacogen, Q1 2006-Q3 2007
      • Figure 27: Summary of unmet needs in the treatment of MDS
      • Figure 28: Clinical development pipeline for MDS, 2007
      • Figure 29: Proteins undergoing farnesylation by farnesyltransferase
      • Figure 30: Phase I/II study of Sarasar in advanced MDS and CMML
      • Figure 31: Phase I/II study of Romiplostim in Low-risk/Intermediate-1 MDS
      • Figure 32: Proteins undergoing farnesylation by farnesyltransferase
      • Figure 33: Phase II study of Zarnestra in Intermediate and High-risk MDS
      • Figure 34: Phase II study of Cloretazine in AML and high-risk MDS
      • Figure 35: Phase II studies of intravenous and oral Clolar in higher-risk MDS
      • Figure 36: Phase I/II study of intravenous Telintra (liposomes for injection) in MDS
概要 原文目次
※この商品は英文にてご提供いたします。
【 英文市場調査報告書 】
骨髄異形成症候群(MDS)
Stakeholder Opinions: Myelodysplastic Syndromes - First approvals spur some interest in a niche market
出版日 : 2007/12
電話でのお問い合わせ
この商品について問い合わせる
この商品のサンプル(抜粋)を依頼する
価格

※ドル建て価格の商品のお支払いは、為替レート (TTS: 92.38) 換算による円建てのご請求書にて承ります。

US $ 3,800 換算 -> ¥ 351,044 (税抜) PDF by E-mail (Single User License)
商品コード : 59584
関連する商品をキーワードで検索する