土壌・地下水浄化技術の米国市場：EPA 地域 1〜5 に関する分析

Abstract

This study is an addendum to the National Overview study published for U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Markets. The study includes state-wise information on statutory authorities, number and status of sites, contaminants of concern, top polluting industries and regional trends.

Offering Value-added Propositions May be Vital to Finalizing Contracts

After a few years of sluggish growth, the remediation market is witnessing healthy activity. Along with the huge amount of federal dollars being spent on cleanups, the private sector has been actively pursuing remediation and redevelopment. While the demand for innovative and cost-effective technologies has raised the bar for remediation contractors, participants are offering value for money propositions as incentives to seal contracts. Schemes such as guaranteed fixed price remediation (GFPR) give clients more freedom and take away a considerable amount of risks involved in undertaking cleanups. While a number of contractors are using such incentives to retain and expand client base, a shift toward corporate clients buying insurance coverage for cleanups is putting remediators at larger risks.

This Frost & Sullivan research service analyzes the U.S. soil and groundwater remediation technology markets -- by analysis regions 1 to 5, besides examining the remediation market across the said regions. It further lists the state specific regulatory programs across these regions and analyzes market participants.

Booming Property Prices Increase Focus on Remediation and Redevelopment

With ever-increasing commercialization, there has been a sharp decline in availability of quality real estate, which is resulting in soaring land prices. To guarantee wider land availability, the federal government is introducing tax benefits and incentives on remediation and redevelopment projects. Even with faster pace of redevelopment, there will still be a huge number of sites to clear over the next decade, and this will ensure continuous federal expenditure on remediation and redevelopment.

In addition, the threat of new emerging contaminants is driving the need for better cleanup technologies and more stringent regulations. While bigger companies have the resources and financial backup to undertake most kinds of remediation projects, small and medium-sized regional companies have the advantage of local presence. "Since, in some cases, it is difficult for bigger companies to relocate resources to certain sites, regional contractors are better positioned to bag these contracts." notes the analyst of this research. "Further, the government administration is providing incentives and benefits to small-and medium-sized firms and giving them preference in federal contracts."

Increased Demand for Cleanups May Ensure Strong Market Growth

With the economy recovering, there is a shift in focus to issues such as remediation, rising industrial and residential property prices, and stringent state public health goals. While this is prompting greater stakeholder pressure for cleanups, state agencies are heeding this demand and implementing more meaningful programs with a view to diminishing discrepancies between the state and federal governments.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regions 1 to 5 are considered a more active market for remedial work, contributing to nearly 60 percent of market revenue. "Despite the seemingly diminished federal funding for programs such as Superfund, the Department of Defense (DOD), and the Department of Energy (DOE), remediation work is picking up in these segments," says the analyst. "With remediation contractors adopting innovative methods of treatment, large-scale Brownfield redevelopments and private sector cleanups may contribute to sustained market growth."

Table of Contents

• 1. Executive Summary
  • 1. Overview
    • 1. Research Overview
• 2. State Specific Regulatory Analysis
  • 1. Variations from Federal Regulations
    • 1. EPA Region 1 States
    • 2. EPA Region 2 States
    • 3. EPA Region 3 States
    • 4. EPA Region 4 States
    • 5. EPA Region 5 States
• 3. Industries and Contaminants
  • 1. Contaminant Analysis and Top Industries
    • 1. EPA Region 1
    • 2. EPA Region 2
    • 3. EPA Region 3
    • 4. EPA Region 4
    • 5. EPA Region 5
• 4. Remediation Site Classification
  • 1. Regional Site Analysis
    • 1. Superfund and NPL Sites
    • 2. Department of Defense (DOD)
    • 3. Department of Energy (DOE)
    • 4. Brownfields
    • 5. Underground Storage Tanks (UST)
    • 6. Private Sector Sites
• 5. Market Evaluation
  • 1. Market and Trends
    • 1. Competitive Structure
    • 2. Company Profiles
    • 3. Regional Trends - Ongoing Remediation Projects
• 6. Frost and Sullivan Awards
  • 1. Award Catergories
    • 1. Business Development Leadership Strategy
    • 2. Growth Strategy Leadership
• 7. Decision Support Database
  • 1. Pertinent Environmental Industry Data
    • 1. Percentage of GroundWater Source Supply
    • 2. Environment Protection Expenditure - A percentage of GDP
    • 3. Environmental Protection Expenditure

List Of Figures

• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Connecticut (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Maine (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Massachusetts (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, New Hampshire (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Rhode Island (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Vermont (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, New Jersey (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, New York (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Puerto Rico (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Virgin Islands (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Delaware (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Maryland (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, District of Columbia (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Pennsylvania (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Virginia (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, West Virginia (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Alabama (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Florida (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Georgia (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Kentucky (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Mississippi (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, North Carolina (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, South Carolina (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Tennessee (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Illinois (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Indiana (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Michigan (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Minnesota (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Ohio (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Contaminants and Top Industries, Wisconsin (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Competitive Structure (U.S.), 2004
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Company profile of Shaw Group
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Company profile of Arcadis
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Company profile of Weston Solutions
• U.S. Soil and Groundwater Remediation Technology Market: Analysis of EPA Regions 1 to 5: Company profile of ENSR International