米国の低侵襲性脊椎固定技術市場：2007年

Abstract

Market expansion is being aided by the accepted benefits that MI spinal fusions provide, including reduced hospital stays, shortened recovery times, and minimized tissue damage. Patient demand for MI procedures, better instrumentation, and improved surgeon training and awareness are also contributing to market growth

The US minimally invasive (MI) spinal fusion market-comprises traditional thoracolumbar fusion devices (such as rods, hooks, and screws) and interbody devices (IBDs) used in MI spinal fusions, and MI access instrumentation.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF EXHIBITS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

METHODOLOGY

1.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION DEVICE OVERVIEW

• 1.1 Anatomy of the Human Spine
  • 1.1.1 Degenerative Spinal Disorders
  • 1.1.2 Deformity Spinal Disorders
  • 1.1.3 Trauma/Tumor Spinal Disorders
  • 1.1.4 Treatment Options
  • 1.1.5 Spinal Fusion
• 1.2 Thoracolumbar Fusion Devices
  • 1.2.1 Implant Design
  • 1.2.2 Thoracolumbar Pathology
• 1.3 Interbody Fusion Devices
  • 1.3.1 Implant Design
  • 1.3.2 Implant Material
  • 1.3.3 Surgical Approach
  • 1.3.4 Note on Interbody Fusion Device Classification

2.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION MARKET OVERVIEW

• 2.1 Market Overview
• 2.2 Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Definitions
• 2.3 Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Market Analysis
  • 2.3.1 Procedures
  • 2.3.2 Market Forecast
  • 2.3.3 Market Drivers and Limiters
• 2.4 Competitive Analysis
  • 2.4.1 Leading Competitors
  • 2.4.2 Other/Emerging Competitors

3.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRADITIONAL THORACOLUMBAR IMPLANT MARKET

• 3.1 Market Overview
• 3.2 Market Analysis

4.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

• 4.1 Market Overview
• 4.2 Market Analysis
  • 4.2.1 Procedures
  • 4.2.2 Market Forecast
    • 4.2.2.1 By Type
    • 4.2.2.2 By Approach

5.0 MINIMALLY INVASIVE ACCESS INSTRUMENTATION MARKET

• 5.1 Market Overview
• 5.2 Market Analysis

APPENDIX A: MRG ACRONYMS AND INITIALISMS

List of Exhibits

EXECUTIVE SUM MARY

• Exhibit ES-1: MI Spinal Fusion Market, by Segment, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit ES-2: MI Traditional Thoracolumbar Implant Market, US (US$), 2006 and 2011
• Exhibit ES-3: MI IBD Fusion Procedures, by Approach, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit ES-4: MI Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit ES-5: Leading Competitors in the US MI Spinal Fusion Market, US, 2006

CHAPTER 1: MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION DEVICE OVERVIEW

• Exhibit 1-1: Roles of the Spinal Column
• Exhibit 1-2: Instrumented Spinal Fusion Procedure Classification
• Exhibit 1-3: IBD Classification

CHAPTER 2: MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL FUSION MARKET OVERVIEW

• Exhibit 2-1: MI Spine Fusion Market, by Device, US (US$) 2005-2011(Graphical Format)
• Exhibit 2-2: Procedural Definitions
• Exhibit 2-3: Market Value Definitions
• Exhibit 2-4: MI TL Spinal Fusion Procedures, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit 2-5: MI Spinal Fusion Market, by Device, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Tabular Format)
• Exhibit 2-6: Drivers of the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US
• Exhibit 2-7: Limiters of the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US
• Exhibit 2-8: Leading Competitors in the MI Spinal Fusion Market, US, 2006
• Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006
• Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)
• Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)
• Exhibit 2-9: Select Minimally Invasive Spine Products, US, 2006 (cont.)

CHAPTER 3: MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRADITIONAL THORACOLUMBAR IMPLANT MARKET

• Exhibit 3-1: MI TL Implant Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Graphical Format)
• Exhibit 3-2: MI TL Implant Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Tabular Format)
• Exhibit 3-3: TL Implant ASPs per Procedure, by Surgery Type, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 3-4: MI TL Implant System ASPs per Procedure, by Number of Levels, US, 2005-2011

CHAPTER 4: MINIMALLY INVASIVE INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET

• Exhibit 4-1: MI IBD Market, by Approach, as a % of Total, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-2: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-3: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-4: MI IBD Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach and Type, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-5: MI Interbody Spinal Fusion Procedures, by Approach and Type, as a % of Total, US, 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-6: MI IBD Market, by Type and by Approach, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-7: MI IBD Market Growth, by Type and by Approach, US, 2006-2011
• Exhibit 4-8: MI TLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-9: MI PLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-10: MI LLIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-11: MI ALIF IBD Market, by Type, US (US$), 2005-2011
• Exhibit 4-12: MI IBD Units per Procedure, by Type and Number of Levels, US, 2005-2011

CHAPTER 5: MINIMALLY INVASIVE ACCESS INSTRUMENTATION MARKET

• Exhibit 5-1: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Graphical Format)
• Exhibit 5-2: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Market, US (US$), 2005-2011 (Tabular Format)
• Exhibit 5-3: MI Spinal Fusion Access Instrumentation Systems, ASP per Procedure, US, 2005-2011