Abstract
This report provides an overview of the HMI solutions adopted for individual
ADAS applications and the challenges that the industry faces to ensure that
the potential safety benefits of multiple ADAS systems are not jeopardised by
poor HMI design.
The study considers the research being conducted across global markets into
the management and presentation of simultaneous ADAS warnings and identifies
the principles and standards that should be adopted by vehicle and system
manufacturers in the future.
Table of Contents
1. Executive summary
- 1.1 Introduction
- 1.2 Conclusions
2. Understanding the need for managing ADAS warnings
- 2.1 Introduction
- 2.2 HMI for stand-alone ADAS applications
- 2.3 HMI for multiple ADAS applications
3. Research into ADAS warning management systems
- 3.1 Background
- 3.2 PReVENT INSAFES (Europe)
- 3.3 AIDE (Europe)
- 3.4 SAVE-IT (US)
- 3.5 National research
- 3.5.1. Germany
- 3.5.2. Japan
- 3.5.3. Netherlands
- 3.5.4. Sweden
4. Guidelines and standards
- 4.1 Background
- 4.2 European guidelines
- 4.2.1. PReVENT Response
- 4.2.2. European Statement of Principles (ESoP)
- 4.3 North American guidelines
- 4.4 Japanese guidelines
- 4.5 Global standards
5. Warning and information management systems
- 5.1 Background
- 5.2 Information management systems
- 5.2.1. Motorola
- 5.2.2. Renault phone call delay system
- 5.2.3. Saab Dialogue Manager
- 5.2.4. Volvo IDIS
- 5.3 Warning management systems
- 5.3.1. Bosch
- 5.3.2. Delphi
- 5.3.3. Siemens VDO
Table of Figures
- Figure 1. Visual HMI options for ADAS
- Figure 2. Inconsistencies in ADAS HMI warnings
- Figure 3. Warning manager concept
- Figure 4. Links between AIDE and INSAFES projects
- Figure 5. AIDE system architecture
- Figure 6. AIDE participants
- Figure 7. PReVENT ADAS architecture
- Figure 8. NHTSA Technical Report participants
- Figure 9. NHTSA warning prioritisation framework
- Figure 10. Volvo Interaction Manager system
- Figure 11. Siemens VDO pro.pilot HMI concept
自動車
その他のカテゴリ
FAQ